Eagle Forum of Sacramento

Rush Limbaugh once said “I am right and say so. This is what irritates people.” This statement gives support of my work on diversity reform. I am grateful when people become irritated by my writings or speeches, for I know my work is moving them toward truth. Enforced diversity programs use the wheel of oppression education to teach “daily compromise” that has and continues to ruin America. Redefined diversity cannot be separated from the problems facing our nation. The most recent compromise is now taking place in conservative circles. It is the “silencing” of social issues.
Authentic Rule of Law, which is God’s authority, natural law, and the Constitution, is being redefined to meet “silence” standards so that all people can work “united” to change America. God’s authority now means to “hush-up” on people’s actions as being right or wrong. Natural law regarding abortion, homosexuality, and entitlement is ignored and if bold about it the person is ostracized and labeled. The meaning of the Constitution changes frequently to satisfy made-up rights.
Introducing these concepts into conservative groups causes mental chaos. Eventually the group compromises their principles to achieve a common cause. An example I offer is a question. One must ask how an authentic Christian and or a common sense thinker can accept a Tea Party Patriot training that teaches them to be silent on social issues because it causes divisiveness. Where does a person fit in who believes in the Tea Party economic principles, loves the group’s boldness, but they still cannot ignore the social issues because of God’s authority? Most importantly how will infiltration of this “silent” principle affect the conservative movement, the authentic “fix” of America, and the answer to God one day when He asks us why?

It’s 2010 and America needs a mend. Diversity Reform USA will join forces with Eagle Forum of Sacramento, California Eagle Forum, other grassroots’ organizations, as well as fellow conservative Americans to make our presence known in Congress, state capitols, and school districts everywhere. Our new program supports the national tea party efforts in letting our public officials know they cannot run our lives. We have rights.
 
Lobbying at your state capitol, or from home, is made easy for you. Simply go to our website at www.diversityreformusa.com and click on Lobby Tea Parties. You will find the monthly topics, facts supporting your position, and your rights. The sample letter can be used as is, or customized for you and or your organization. You can name your representatives and school board members, if you choose, in the appropriate space.

Lobbying with others is productive and also fun. Setting a monthly date to lobby in person, or from home via fax or mail, assures us that public officials working for us will take notice. Our website education is simple, and can be used for in home tea parties and get-togethers. My book, The Hoax Of The Century: White Privilege And The Wheel of Oppression, available in e-book and now printed book form, includes chapter questions.
 
Use e-mail, face book, and word of mouth to share this information. You can make a difference. The Massachusetts election was clear; people are coming out of apathy. A national tea party mentality is brewing and the message is clear for liberals, young and old. Click on our site and get important information. It will give you what you need to help STOP the transformation of this great nation.
 
We can STOP discrimination against Judeo-Christian faith, European descent, and traditional patriots (The Big Three). We have equal protection of the law and we will be silenced no more. The Sacramento kick-off at the Capitol will be January 27th. We will lobby on pro-life issues, including the nation wide life threatening Day of Silence April 16th. Help mend America in 2010 and pioneer Lobby Tea Parties and Get-Togethers.
 
Georgiana Preskar
Executive Director-Diversity Reform USA
www.diversityreformusa.com
Director-Eagle Forum of Sacramento
www.eagleforumofsacramento.com
Email Georgiana at georgianapreskar@yahoo.com

Teri Lawrence
Managing Director-Diversity Reform USA
Republican Central Committee Board

Please Contact the Members of the Senate Public Safety Committee!

On Tuesday, April 28, the Senate Public Safety Committee will hear Senate Bill 697.

SB697, authored by State Senator Mark DeSaulnier (D-7), would prohibit the sale of handguns other than “owner-authorized (or ‘smart’) handguns” — that is, handguns with a permanent, programmable biometric feature that renders the firearm useless unless activated by the authorized user. No proven, viable handgun of this type has ever been developed. The bill would require the California Attorney General to report to the Governor and Legislature on the availability of owner-authorized handguns; once the Attorney General finds that these guns are available, only “owner-authorized” handguns could be approved for sale in California .

Please contact the Senate Public Safety Committee and respectfully urge them to oppose SB697. Contact information can be found below.

SENATE PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE:

State Senator Mark Leno (D-3) – Chair
(916) 651-4003
senator.leno@senate.ca.gov

State Senator John J. Benoit (R-37) – Vice-Chair
(916) 651-4037

State Senator Gilbert Cedillo (D-22)
(916) 651-4022

State Senator Loni Hancock (D-9)
(916) 651-4009

State Senator Robert Huff (R-29)
(916) 651-4029

State Senator Darrell Steinberg (D-6)
(916) 651-4006

State Senator Roderick Wright (D-25)
(916) 651-4025

By TVC Chairman Louis P. Sheldon & TVC Executive Director Andrea Lafferty
We just spent 5 hours sitting in the House Judiciary Committee hearing room monitoring the debate over passage of the so-called hate crime bill, H.R. 1913, the Local Law Enforcement Hate Crimes Prevention Act. This legislation is designed to add “sexual orientation,” “gender” and “gender identity” as specially protected categories of persons under federal law.

During the debates between Republicans and Democrats, it became clear that Democrats were prepared to vote down every amendment offered by the Republican minority – and that’s what they did.

We were there to monitor the debate. Throughout the mark-up, we interacted directly with Members of Congress and their staffers on this dangerous legislation

There are two versions of the ten commandments (Decalogue) given in the Bible. The first is contained in Exodus 20, and the second in Deuteronomy 5. All churches have preferred to use the version given in Exodus. According to Exodus 34:28 and Deuteronomy 4:13, God wrote upon the tablets “ten commandments,” and so Exodus 20:2-17 is to be divided into ten parts; but this division is done differently by different writers. The oldest method, found in the writings of Philo and Josephus (first century), takes verse 3 as the first commandment, verses 4 through 6 as the second, and so forth. This is called the Philonic division, and it was adopted by the Greek Church and by Protestants (except Lutherans). Later the Jewish Talmud (third century) treated the preface in verses 1 and 2 as the first of ten “sayings” and combined verses 3-6 as the second saying. This is called the Talmudic division, and was adopted by all Jews. In the fifth century Saint Augustine listed the ten commandments by beginning with the Talmudic second saying as the first commandment; and, following the word order of Deuteronomy 5:21, making the ninth commandment a prohibition of the coveting of a neighbor’s wife, and the tenth a prohibition of coveting his house and other property. This is known as the Augustinian division. (1) The Roman Catholic church accepted Augustine’s method, and Luther also continued in this tradition with one modification: he preferred to follow the word order of Exodus 20, and so his ninth commandment became a prohibition against coveting the house and his tenth prohibited coveting the wife, slaves, and animals. Lutherans continue to follow this method.

The table below shows the four different traditions of numbering: Philonic (P); Talmudic (T); Augustinian (A); and Lutheran (L).

by Georgiana Preskar

“I am the Lord Thy God.” “Thou shalt have no other Gods before me.” Diversity is not mentioned in these Ten-Commandment directives. However the election results clearly indicated the American people have put other gods before Him.

People voted in Obama with compromised reasoning and surely not common sense. There is no debate on abortion, homosexuality, redistribution of wealth, and much more.

Regardless of America being a great world leader, Marxists have moved in and made it their home. Citizens were elated and comfortable voting in a secular, socialist, and anti-traditional man to be our leader.

People of America claim commitment to God, yet their humanist leanings led them, following the election, to weep joyful tears for a man that they knew nothing about. Few paid attention to this man’s background. Obama’s rhetoric, skillfully delivered, implied a person was confused, or mistaken, if they told the truth of his devious history.

The young like the idea of socialism; what could be better than doing D work, but receiving an A mark. Some young people actually said, “We do not have to worry about putting gas in the car, or paying our mortgage. We hope this will take place very soon.”

There were 95% of blacks and a great percentage of Latinos that voted for Obama. Yet this was not considered racist? Many of them knew of his abortion leanings, but denial was used to insist that he would not enforce his views on the nation. Their naivety insists that increasing taxes on the supposed rich promotes prosperity.

Some blacks said, as did Michele Obama, they now could be proud of America. Oprah Winfrey and Whoopi Goldberg stated similar sentiments that they could now “finally put down their suitcases.” There was no humbleness in these statements, only entitlement thinking that now has many saying that Universal health care is a right for all.”

People projected god like qualities to a man who smooth talked them into believing he was capable of all things, while they, including many Christians, rejected the teachings of Almighty God. They were right; for this man will do everything he can to reshape this nation. He has the perfect situation. America gave away our Godly heritage years ago and with Congressional backing and a compromised nation, he has the right away.

Spike Lee said on one of his pre-elections ads that the old America no longer exists, and “Republicans were TV people stuck in the Father Knows Best, Howdy Dowdy, and Leave It To Beaver series of the past.” I am grateful that we are stuck in the joy of these times. If we allow the enemy from within to destroy our joy then we become a victim.

So what direction do we take now? It is simple; we must start with the basics, which is common sense. This comes from God’s laws and the laws of nature. Eagle Forum of Sacramento’s mission statement is to protect our children for survival of America, but we must work with all age groups to rekindle the American Way.

In 2009, Eagle Forum of Sacramento will work to restore common sense by bringing to the forefront the Ten Commandments and how they relate to political agendas that affect our freedoms. Authority figures, including the clergy, have turned their backs on clarity of right and wrong. Only through the truth can any resemblance of America be saved.

May God bless us with wisdom, courage, and strength to do His work in restoring and reeducating people in common sense values. We look forward to sharing our innovative program with you in the New Year. We hope you will join us in getting rid of false gods by putting God in his rightful place.

By David E. Young
Published Wednesday, November 5, 2008 2:32 PM MST
Campaign Obama is deceptive about his views on firearms rights and sportsmen. He voted for banning almost every hunting rifle and shotgun in Illinois and authorizing state police raids of gunowners’ homes to forcibly confiscate banned arms. Richard Pearson, lobbyist of Illinois’ largest firearms organization, had numerous contacts with Obama on firearms legislation. Pearson’s article indicating Obama is misleading firearms owners and sportsmen on his Second Amendment views is at: www.isra.org/

A Joyce Foundation director for eight years, Obama helped Joyce bankroll gun control across America. During Obama’s tenure, projects lavishly funded academics in rewriting the Second Amendment out of the Bill of Rights to influence court decisions. Further information on the plan to undercut Bill of Rights protection is at: pajamasmedia.com/blog/obama-and-the-attempt-to-destroy-the-second-amendment/ and my criticism of the history-rewriting recipients and results are at: hnn.us/articles/47238.html

Obama supported Washington DC’s draconian gun laws as “reasonable”. He will appoint judges to subjectively decide such issues based on amorphous fairness and justice standards rather than what the Constitution states. Do you want a government of laws, not men – or Obama’s frightening alternative?

Senator Obama stated he cannot ban guns because he cannot get enough votes. With Democratic control of Congress, he can get enough votes for gun control and sloppy judges . Concerned voters must inform themselves about Obama’s past gun control support and not rely on the slick information from his campaign. A concerted effort exists to mislead gun owners and sportsmen Obama is their friend and supporter, which evidence directly contradicts.

Please continue to pray that an Obama Nation does not turn in to an abomination! Godly principles are at risk in our country.
Thank God that Proposition 8 passed, but there is already talk of creating entirely new Constitutions at the State and Federal levels. This is the next step towards communism and the complete abandonment of God in America.

In the next few weeks Californians will be inundated with media messages about the
importance of allowing same-sex marriages. Voters will see TV ads telling them that
homosexual love deserves “equality” with heterosexual love. Voters will hear radio
reports about how all gays and lesbians want is to have the same “rights” as all
married couples. And the main message that will be repeated is that allowing homosexuals
to marry will have no impact on your marriage or your family-so what’s the harm
in giving gays their chance to marry?
Although on the surface these arguments appear convincing, they don’t tell the whole
truth.
Homosexual marriage will have a direct, intrusive and damaging effect on your family.
Public Schools will teach that homosexuality and same-sex marriage are normal and
acceptable-and if you disagree, you are a bigot. Books like “Heather has Two Mommies”
or “Daddy’s Wedding” will be used to teach kindergartners about homosexual relationships.
When parents in Boston complained about an eighth-grade teacher instructing students
about gay sex, the teacher responded, “Give me a break. It’s legal now.”

Churches will be required to perform homosexual marriage ceremonies or face prosecution
under anti-discrimination laws. The California Supreme Court recently ruled that
medical professionals may not defer treatment to another professional based on
their religious objections. In other words, Christians and those with moral beliefs
must check their conscience at the door when they arrive at work. The same case
law will apply to churches. Pastors will no longer be allowed to refuse marrying
homosexuals based on their religious beliefs.

Businesses will be prosecuted for not participating in homosexual ceremonies. A
New Mexico photography company is being prosecuted for refusing to photograph the
“commitment ceremony” of a homosexual couple. The full force of the government will
used to make citizens publicly accept homosexuality.

Married couples will no longer be considered “bride and groom,” but “Party A and
Party B.” A young couple in Placer County wrote the terms “bride” and “groom” on
their marriage license, which was returned from the state as an “unacceptable alteration.”
A husband and wife are legally referred to now as Party A and Party B according
to the California government. By redefining marriage, every marriage has already
been affected.
The role of parents will be diminished. The family unit is already under assault
with no-fault divorce, acceptance of single parenthood, and nanny government usurping
the role of fathers. Homosexual marriage worsens this trend by giving government
approval to single-sex parenting. Children need both a mother and a father. By
approving homosexual marriage, government and society denies children their right
and need for both parents.
These are just a few of the negative, damaging consequences of allowing homosexual
marriage in our society. When you encounter a neighbor, church member, work associate,
or family member who says, “I’m not a bigot-and homosexual marriage won’t affect
me,” remind them of just how much it will impact their family and all families.
This is not an issue of bigotry, but of ensuring marriage isn’t redefined by four
activist judges. Wanting children to be raised by both of their parents isn’t bigoted
either. What’s truly bigoted is telling Christians, Jews, Muslims and other people
of faith that their beliefs must be silenced.