June 29, 2008

Mass Rapes Are Policy in Dictatorships

Filed under: Candidate Updates — Teri Lawrence @ 8:25 pm

Tuesday 17 June 2008, by admin, California Political News

Democrats claim to be the defender of women. Yet, in the Sudan, Iraq under Saddam, Iran and other nations, these folks are silent.

As this article shows, rape is used on a massive scale to control the population.

President Bush and Senator McCain want to stop this abuse, while Obama and his sychophants prefer rape to freedom. Do not listen to their words, watch their actions.

Why do Democrats worry if you use a headset well driving and using your cell phone, but care little about a government policy of rape?

Democrats love good speeches and bad policies. Too bad women are sacrificed by them.

June 25, 2008

Alaskan Polar Bears Not Threatened

Filed under: Candidate Updates — Teri Lawrence @ 9:02 pm

Tuesday 17 June 2008, by admin/California Political News

This article shows facts that Obama and his radical sycophants do not want you to know:

“The fact is, polar bears aren’t endangered, either by oil companies or climate change, says IBD. The world polar bear population is at a modern high and growing:

* Mitch Taylor, polar bear biologist with the Government of Nunavut, a territory in Canada, puts the current population at 24,000, up 40 percent since 1974.

* Some 2,000 of these bears live in and around the Chukchi Sea, where the oil companies purchased leases worth $2.6 billion in February.

* There’s no proof of a single bear being harmed by oil operations in Alaska since 1993.

* Since 1960, when the Alaska oil hunt began, only two oil-related bear fatalities have been documented.”

In reality, the Obama Luddites want high energy prices and control of the economy. They prefer to kill jobs and harm families than protect Americans. Shame on them.

June 20, 2008

Paying Fathers to be Fathers?

Filed under: Candidate Updates — Teri Lawrence @ 10:11 am

Posted by Bobby Eberle
June 17, 2008 at 6:19 am

I realize that Democrats want government to rule our lives — to be in every aspect of our daily routine — at the expense of our hard-earned tax dollars. They believe that “government” is some sort of separate being that should “care” for us, but they forget that government has no money of its own. Nothing is free, and when the government does something to “help,” that money is coming from our pockets.

Now, ultra liberal Barack Obama wants the government to pay fathers for being fathers. That’s right, instead of expecting fathers to have common sense to do the right thing in raising families, Obama wants the government to give the father a payment. As the father of two, and the son of a single parent, I find this proposal to be outrageous. People need to take responsibility for their own actions. I have no desire whatsoever to pay even more taxes just to get some 18-year-old punk to act like a father.

In a Father’s Day speech, Obama said the following:

We should reward fathers who pay that child support with job training and job opportunities and a larger Earned Income Tax Credit that can help them pay the bills. We should expand programs where registered nurses visit expectant and new mothers and help them learn how to care for themselves before the baby is born and what to do after — programs that have helped increase father involvement, women’s employment, and children’s readiness for school. We should help these new families care for their children by expanding maternity and paternity leave, and we should guarantee every worker more paid sick leave so they can stay home to take care of their child without losing their income.

Letting this passage soak in and reading other parts of his speech, you see just how liberal and on the far left fringe Obama is. Leading up to the comments above, Obama said, “Because if fathers are doing their part … then our government should meet them halfway.”

What in the world is he saying? I’ll tell you… he’s saying that if a father does what he is supposed to be doing, he should get taxpayer-funded benefits. This is ridiculous! Let’s see an “Obama” example…. A father is ordered by the court to pay child support. The father complies with the law, and now part of my paycheck is supposed to be forwarded to this guy simply because he is obeying the law? What kind of sense does that make?

I understand that lower-income families have it tough. But tough times do not mean that people should get a break from doing stupid things. My father died when I was 15. My sisters were 13 and 6. My mother, who had no college education or regular job at the time, was thrust instantly into the role of breadwinner. She not only raised us and provided for us, she continued her education along the way. She didn’t need the government to tell her what her responsibilities were or how to be a good parent.

The black community has an absolutely dismal rate of families with no fathers, but it is up to the individuals to do what is right and change that mentality. They should not be paid by the government to exercise common sense and provide for their children. It is the community that has been accepting this behavior, and it is the community that must change. And it can change without my tax money.